Blaze Burner rear light review

Blaze is a true Kickstarter success story. Their lazerlight is a great light for London as well as a beautiful piece of design and has recently been found to be the safest bike light available. Not only that, but the laser is currently being trailed in the Santander bikes with the hope of rolling it out across the whole fleet.

Burner rear light

Blaze are now branching out and extending their line to include a rear light. To continue with their tradition they launched the campaign on Kickstarter and smashed their target within a few days. The light will be produced and in backers hands early next year, but we got our hands on one early so we can give you the scoop on it while the campaign is still running.

Features

The light has 24 LEDs which combine to produce 100 lumens. The casing is metal inline with the quality you get from its big brother lazerlight. The light mounts into a clamp around the seat post. The mount is magnetic and super strong. It also allows the light to be mounted vertically or horizontally.

Having so many individual lights means that the options for flashing patterns and brightness settings are extensive. At the moment there are several programmed in but there may be even more by launch as Blaze are crowd sourcing ideas for modes from backers. The multiple LEDs also mean that the light can be super bright and act as a flare type light to increase your visibility in daylight, while also not being too dazzling for those following behind you.

Blaze on bike

The light charges with a special usb lead, the same one that charges the front light. The battery holds a charge for ages, so you can rest assured that the light you are keeping in your bag just incase is going to work when you need it. The battery also lasts a good amount of time when on as well, with 7.5 hours at full brightness.

There is an auto mode which allows the light to turn on when light levels drop. To make this work there is a smart sensor on the light to turn the brightness up when you go into a dark area, or the light level drops while you are riding.

In use

The Burner can be seriously bright. Blaze advise that you don’t use the brightest setting in a city, and I can see why: its just painfully bright to look at. However, as a flare type light during the day and in fog or out in the countryside it would be awesome.

The flash settings are really good for visibility. There is one that chases around the light and one that alternates sides. These are different enough from the standard flash of many lights that they are quite eye catching. They also mean that you don’t really loose the light at all for even a second, therefore making it safer is a driver is just briefly glancing in your direction.

The auto mode takes a little practice to get in place but is a really nice feature. It is possible to still scroll through the flash modes in auto. This means that when you go into a darker area you can have your desired flash setting come on.

The bracket is secure on the bike, fixing on a with a screw so you can happily leave it there when you take the light from the bike. The magnetic mount seems secure as well. I didn’t take it on any particularly rough cobbled streets but the roads around me are anything but smooth!

Blaze casing

Finish wise the light feels really robust. It is rated as completely waterproof so it is perfectly safe in the horrible weather London can throw at you. The metal finish is a really nice touch and makes it stand out from a pretty packed crowd of lighting options.

Problems?

So, it seems pretty great, right? Well it is, and I genuinely like the light and would like one for myself (they would probably notice if I don’t return one of the very few currently in existence). There are a couple of tweaks that could make this even better. Two of these will be addressed by the time the light is launched – more bracket options and smoother light programming, so nothing major to put you off there.

The main downside I can see with the light that is not possible to change at a later date is its side visibility. Blaze say that there is more than 180 degree visibility and to some extent this is true for an arc behind the bike. However, there really isn’t much visibility from the side. In a city it would be nice to have a larger perspex area to enhance this. It would eat up the lovely metal finish so aesthetically it might have an impact.

Conclusions

Blaze Burner

This is a really well made, functional light. It is everything you would expect from a rear light from Blaze. It can be super bright or eye-catching and does everything you need a rear light to do – help you be seen- and nothing you don’t need. I felt pretty visible cycling around with this on the bike, unlike some other options out there.

One of the things I like best about the lazerlight is how long the battery lasts when it is being stored. This is something carried through to the Burner and makes it highly usable all year round and perfect for storing in your bag in the summer months as well.

Currently with the Kickstarter the light is available for backing at £39, which makes it amazingly well priced for such a high spec, high powered light. When it arrives in the Spring, it will be £49 which, in my opinion is still excellent value. It will be interesting to see what they do in terms of further programming settings and brackets. The light is perfectly good without these things, but they would certainly make it more universally appealing.

There will also be a front light option for the same price and therefore with these two offerings Blaze have really become a full bike light company. To get your hands on a Burner, head over to the Kickstarter page.

Join 10,221 fellow cyclists who are subscribed to the London Cyclist newsletter

Sign up for our free newsletter to get...

  • Advice on the best cycling gear
  • A Friday roundup of all the latest London cycling news
  • Exclusive content not available on the blog

Subscribe today, and get exclusive access forever! (It's free)

*No spam, ever!

As seen on The Guardian, BBC and The Independent.

8 Responses to Blaze Burner rear light review

  1. Bob 04/12/2015 at 10:32 am #

    Looks very big, not for me. Side visibility is very important on all bike lights. Would need to be improved before I bought one.

  2. Andrew Smith 04/12/2015 at 11:00 am #

    So the original front light was very expensive and its major selling point was a rather pointless green splodge on the road that no one other than the rider could really see.
    The follow up is a very expensive rear light that has poor side visibility.
    Not sure why anyone would buy either.

  3. Phil 04/12/2015 at 12:11 pm #

    I don’t think B&M have anything to worry about; their most recent rear light has a brake light function like a car, which would be very helpful in traffic; their lights also have excellent side visibility designed in. And they aren’t anything like as expensive.

  4. Alan Southern 04/12/2015 at 11:00 pm #

    One thing that has not been addressed in the review, and this is common to ALL rear lights for cyclists, is the matter of the flashing modes. I believe, please correct me if I am wrong, that flashing modes are allowed in the UK only if they are simple on and off. Those that chase or have some other flashing mode (a cycling friend has one of these and I was made aware of this yesterday afternoon when cycling in south Wales) are illegal. Whether the police would do anything about this I have no idea. My understanding of this legal requirement was reading two or three years ago when moves were being made to allow flashing front and rear lights legally. Perhaps London Cyclist could find out and get an article on this point.

    • AJ 15/12/2015 at 10:08 am #

      Rule 60!
      At night your cycle MUST have white front and red rear lights lit. It MUST also be fitted with a red rear reflector (and amber pedal reflectors, if manufactured after 1/10/85). White front reflectors and spoke reflectors will also help you to be seen. Flashing lights are permitted but it is recommended that cyclists who are riding in areas without street lighting use a steady front lamp.

      So basically you’re over thinking it, so long as you have a light on the front and back you should be fine.

  5. Kie 05/12/2015 at 4:37 pm #

    I think if you’re going to make a light very bright then the light output should be spread out over an area IE not point sources but a large square or shape like with motor vehicle rear lights.

    And agree about flashing modes, they shouldn’t be annoying, overly distracting or unsafe.

  6. Brian 24/12/2015 at 8:09 am #

    Why have they used a special USB cable? If you need to charge at the office, you’ll have to have it with you. Barking! My Cateye lights use standard mini or micro USB, which is much more practical/ sensible.

  7. Mark 06/01/2016 at 1:58 pm #

    I think that the rear light might be a good item to have, if you don’t care about the side visibility cause I don’t believe that these lights would be noticed. I also like that they are only 100 lumen, which should be sufficient for most London roads and won’t annoy me if I were riding behind the user. As with the front light, well, I have never quite supported it unless it’s used in combination with a separate standard white light. I believe that there is a danger of some users substituting the white light with the projector of the pretty green logo.

Leave a Reply